Travel safety comparison · Africa
Rwanda vs Uganda: safety comparison
vs
Side-by-side safety comparison of Rwanda and Uganda for 2026: risk scores, FCDO and US State Department advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ legal status, and the practical decision between the two.
Rwanda carries a materially lower safety risk than Uganda on the composite Warnely score: 31/100 against 56/100, a gap of 25 points. The biggest single category gap is in crime, where Rwanda scores 2/5 against Uganda's 3/5. The US State Department currently carries a Level 2 advisory on Rwanda and a Level 3 on Uganda.
| 🇷🇼Rwanda | 🇺🇬Uganda | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 31 / 100 | 56 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Exercise Normal Caution | High Risk |
| UK FCDO advisory | avoid all but essential travel to parts of country | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 2 (Exercise Increased Caution) | Level 3 (Reconsider Travel) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #91 | #113 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Exercise Caution |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | legal | death |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | RWF | UGX |