Travel safety comparison · Africa
Rwanda vs South Sudan: safety comparison
vs
Side-by-side safety comparison of Rwanda and South Sudan for 2026: risk scores, FCDO and US State Department advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ legal status, and the practical decision between the two.
Rwanda carries a materially lower safety risk than South Sudan on the composite Warnely score: 31/100 against 87/100, a gap of 56 points. The biggest single category gap is in crime, where Rwanda scores 2/5 against South Sudan's 5/5. The US State Department currently carries a Level 2 advisory on Rwanda and a Level 4 on South Sudan. Women's-safety rating differs: Rwanda is Exercise Caution and South Sudan is Do Not Travel.
| 🇷🇼Rwanda | 🇸🇸South Sudan | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 31 / 100 | 87 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Exercise Normal Caution | Do Not Travel |
| UK FCDO advisory | avoid all but essential travel to parts of country | avoid all travel to whole country |
| US State Department advisory | Level 2 (Exercise Increased Caution) | Level 4 (Do Not Travel) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #91 | #156 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Do Not Travel |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | legal | illegal |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | RWF | SSP |